Law and Conflicting Perspectives Essay

Composers represent contrasted perspectives through their own unique experiences and value as their political and social contexts. Geoffrey Robertsons self styled annals The Justice Game written in the tardily 1900s heavily considers these conflicting perspectives in the Trials of Oz and The Romans in Britain through the employment of emotive and persuasive row and ridicule in the form of irony to which puzzle Robertsons view through his eyes.Such conflicts in any case portrayed in Charles Waterstreets article Its a long fickle road to justness which homogeneous to Robertsons use of persuasive techniques utilizes satire to challenge and question the myopic procedures of the effective system. As society develops, along with it come the changes in values and beliefs this is evident in The Trials of Oz which displays the differing attitudes and conflicting perspectives between genesis gaps.The Trials of Ozs Rupert Bear was one of great discourtesy in Robertsons time, whereas today material similar to this is everywhere and is mostly socially acceptable which parallely reflect the beliefs of freedom of speech and individuality growing within society.Robertson himself believed these values which is evident in his view establish across in a metaphor for describing the legal system as the justice game reveal the lack of freedom of speech and individuality citation within it, which is reinforced through the chapter through repetition, arising questions for the responder. In the Trials Of Oz, Robertson uses persuasive language to describe the defendants as dear young men and to characterise Oz as a harmless coffee-table magazine for the revolution that would never run across.